Hatrick Penry for President in 2016
By Hatrick ‘Hattie’ Penry
August 20th, 2015
If I could wave a magic wand and become President AND if I could then wave that magic wand 50 more times here is what I would make happen, in no particular order:
|1) Open Presidential debates to more than just the republican/democratic parties.
2) Allow Americans a ‘vote of no confidence’ at the end of 1 year (President and Congress.)
3) Allow for proportional representation.
4) Decriminalize cannabis in all U.S. states, end the war on drugs, release all non-violent drug offenders from prison.
5) Pass legislation outlawing aerosol engineering (bring back and pass H.R. 2977 in original form).
6) Enact the ‘Freedom From Disinformation Act’: pass legislation making intentional, organized deception of the American public a felony.
7) Bring all troops home, close all bases around the world and cease all warfare.
8) Reverse GATT, NAFTA, TPPA etc.
9) Close multiple agencies and begin arrests en masse of employees of all agencies who committed acts of treason or criminal acts.
10) Arrest/fire Congress and replace with Americans drawn from the ranks of the working poor as would be done in assembling a jury.
11) Members of Congress and their staff shall have 1 year term limits and be paid by the state of their origin. Their salaries shall be reduced to a living wage.
12) Arrest bankers involved in the financial meltdowns.
13) Arrest the 5,198 Pentagon and DOD child porn transmitters, this includes the 76 that had Top Secret clearances.
14) Charge any and all former Presidents and members of their administrations with war crimes as the evidence indicates.
15) Open a real investigation into 911 following all leads and making arrests as needed.
16) Open a real investigation into Plume Gate following all leads and making arrests as needed.
17) Open a real investigation into our military using untraceable weapons (intensified and directed weather systems, remote earthquake technology, tsunami bombs etc.) in the US and abroad.
18) Open a real investigation into the rash of ‘lone gunman’ shooters in the U.S. in light of what we now know about MKULTRA and CIA/Pentagon efforts to create a ‘robot assassin’ with mind control technology.
19) Create a new court run by the working poor…this court supersedes all courts even the supreme court. This ‘Nuremberg’ type court will be responsible for trying those arrested for treason.
20) Arrest/fire Supreme Court, limit future Supreme Court terms.
21) Cease all funding for drones.
22) Outlaw fluoride as an additive in drinking water.
23) Begin the systematic shut down and decommissioning of all nuclear plants.
24) Release all suppressed patents/technologies in the U.S.
25) Reverse the decision that gave corporations the rights of persons.
26) Limit and make transparent any and all campaign financing during elections.
27) End Obama-care and create universal health care similar to what France has or any other system based on creating healthier humans not healthier profits.
28) Outlaw genetically modified foods, seeds and animals.
29) Pass a farm bill that distributes land to poor families that are willing to farm non-GMO crops/animals in an effort to create a healthy food supply for all Americans.
30) Outlaw the lobbying of government officials.
31) Shut down and decommission H.A.A.R.P. and launch an investigation into the potential for abuse with the GWEN towers.
32) Restore the Bill of Rights by whatever means necessary.
33) Form a committee to examine how the Constitution has been subverted and to create countermeasures to prevent future subversions.
34) Nationalize the Federal Reserve and print Constitutional money.
35) Forgive/remove national debt and all personal debt.
36) Release all documentation related to the JFK assassination and launch a new investigation.
37) Dismantle the nuclear stockpile and cease all funding for future nuclear weapons.
38) Leave the United Nations.
39) Remove all U.S. weapons and weapon systems from Europe.
40) Create a program to rebuild America’s infrastructure and build a train system comparable to China’s train system.
41) Close the IRS and institute a fair, across the board flat tax (or any system which is simple, logical and fair).
42) Have all depleted uranium weapons removed from the arsenal and warehoused/decommissioned.
43) Initiate funding and programs to find CURES for all diseases/illnesses that we are currently TREATING.
44) Cease all foreign aid.
45) Provide funding to house all homeless veterans and provide them with prompt, hassle free medical attention.
46) Form commission to review public school textbooks for accuracy.
47) Replace FaceBook and YouTube with public platforms.
48) Outlaw animal testing.
49) Order the Marines to invade and occupy Cognac, France and take control of their vineyards and distilleries (just kidding!).
50) Give global address of peace and goodwill to world…
President Obama Calls for Emergency Press Conference to Address Chem-Trails
by Hatrick ‘Hattie’ Penry
August 15th, 2015
In an emergency press conference Friday morning, President Obama addressed the nation on the subject of Chem-Trails: a term that refers to the aerial spraying of nano-particulates in an effort to modify the climate or change weather patterns. In recent months public outcry over the ongoing climate modification campaign over U.S. skies has reached a feverish pitch with protesters taking it to the streets in a nationwide protest involving millions.
Unable to avoid the subject of intentional climate modification any longer, President Obama called for an emergency press conference in an effort to calm the American public.
“Now folks I didn’t call this press conference to blow smoke up you’re you-know-what because that’s just not my style” the President said Friday, “so let me be perfectly clear: yes, Chem-Trails are real. And it might be true that up until today they represented a significant health hazard to the American public, but I want you to know that I’ve issued a new Presidential Directive that will keep the public safe, healthy and put their fears to rest. I’ve issued PPD-666, a directive that mandates Chem-Trails be enriched with 12 essential vitamins and nutrients. Vitamins and nutrients that your body needs anyway. And from here on I’d appreciate it if eveyone referred to them as ‘vita-trails’ because that’s what they are. Those of you concerned with vitamin D deficiency due to ‘global dimming’ need not be, vitamin D is in fact one of the many vitamins we’ll be spraying you with, so please, rest easy knowing you’re going to be healthier than you’ve ever been! Now I’d like to let my homegirl Gina McCarthy have the mic for a minute to elaborate on the new plan, thank you.”
The head of the EPA took only a brief moment to detail the new directive:
“I just want Americans to know that these ‘vita-trails’ are a wicked cool deal, ok? And because they’re a wicked cool deal there’s really no need to question or examine the details of this deal. Again, it’s not just a deal. And it’s more than a cool deal. It’s actually a wicked cool deal. And that’s why the American public likes it. Thank you.”
It was not immediately clear if the announcement of President Obama’s new directive had its desired effect of placating the American public but Democrats in Washington were already hailing it as yet another of the President’s many successes while in office.
Global Warming, Climate Change and Collapse Theorists Suffer Selective Memory Loss
By Hatrick ‘Hattie’ Penry
August 13th, 2015
It appears to me that there are several large, organized groups circulating around the internet promoting either ‘Global Warming’, ‘Climate Change’ or the ‘Collapse Theory’. Those participating in the promotion of these subjects can be found on FaceBook, YouTube, Blogs, Websites, online radio shows and other places online and in social media. It is of course very nice of them to alert us to the obvious fact that our environment is degrading and there will be consequences to pay for it, but it seems they are suffering from a form of selective memory loss: they have omitted any discussion of the possibility that these doomsday scenarios could be intentionally engineered.
This should be a red flag for everyone. For instance, when I read an article about ‘climate change’ in the Huffington Post and I see no mention of geo-engineering or climate modification I know something is wrong. Is it rational to discuss climate change without pointing out that it may be intentionally manufactured? Fair and unbiased reporting demands that all sides of a story are covered, even if one of those sides shines a negative light on the establishment.
“In the broadest sense, weather-modification can be divided into two major categories: suppression and intensification of weather patterns. In extreme cases, it might involve the creation of completely new weather patterns, attenuation or control of severe storms, or even alteration of global climate on a far-reaching and/or long-lasting scale.” from “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” a research paper submitted to the Air Force in August of 1996
I’ve noticed this tactic before. Back in 2012, not long after I began to write about the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Freedom of Information documents pertaining to Fukushima and the cover-up revealed within, I realized that the ‘alternative media’ and the so-called ‘anti-nuclear’ movement were ignoring all the evidence I had accumulated. They talked an awful lot about how bad radiation was. They talked an awful lot about how bad Fukushima was. But they seemed to have suffered from selective memory loss over the NRC FOIA documents. It was glaring. It was obvious. And still to this day how many broadcasters, journalists and bloggers have you seen covering the NRC FOIA documents?
“I do agree that there has been a deafening silence in the alternative media over this massive government orchestrated cover-up. It’s not about the alternative media not covering the disaster. It is about the alternative [media] not covering the recently released documents that prove there was a concerted government cover-up.” -Author/Blogger Alexander Higgins in 2012
What else could I conclude but that the so-called ‘anti-nuclear’ movement was some sort of giant disinformation ring, a shill-network if you will. Their main strategy is to flood social media with myriad discussions about Fukushima but to avoid any talk of the massive multi-agency cover-up revealed in the FOIA transcripts. The overall effect is that the casual observer will, 99 times out of a hundred, come across the media of this massive disinformation network instead of the media of a handful of truth tellers: their numbers are many, our numbers are few. Most casual investigators, searching for the truth about Fukushima, or climate change for that matter, will never see all the evidence they will need to make an informed decision.
It is an illusion that you are being told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. It is in reality a confidence trick. A sin of omission. And, as I have explained before, like cutting off a gangrenous toe to save the leg. The establishment is willing to give you some dirt, maybe a lot of dirt, on their dirty deeds, but the worst of the worst, the most damaging information is being withheld. Do you understand that this can only work by having a massive network of ‘perception management specialists’ at the disposal of the establishment? A network of shills large enough to flood the internet with countless superficial issues of a lower priority thus covering up the most serious issues that might really lead to charges and someone going to jail. This is the only reason that Plume-Gate has never ‘gone viral’. This is the reason the public talks about Climate Change whilst knowing nothing of the topic of geo-engineering. The information monopoly is too strong. Their numbers are too many. Their influence too strong.
And so the establishment must be pleased about the selective memory loss that causes promoters of Global Warming, Climate Change, or an impending collapse to forget to mention the possibility of intentional climate modification. Do they not consider the possibility that the degrading environment we are experiencing is being hastened by the ongoing geo-engineering campaign? To be sure man’s activity on earth is having a detrimental effect on our environment and will ultimately cause a collapse if unchecked, that I do not deny. But isn’t it possible that intentional geo-engineering is hastening this process? Shouldn’t this be a part of any logical discussion of global warming, climate change or a future collapse? It may be up to you to ensure that it is.
Election 2016: Analysis of Republican ‘Debate’
By Hatrick ‘Hattie’ Penry
August 7th, 2016
Now that first Republican debate is over we can sit back and reflect on last night’s bit of theatre. Yes, I said theatre. You see it’s all orchestrated and controlled. From who is allowed to debate to who is allowed to ask questions to the very questions themselves.
All of it was planned, orchestrated and executed in same manner as your local playhouse puts on a theatrical production. Nothing is left to chance. There will be no open and free asking of questions. A list of questions has been formulated and moderators and the public alike are free to ask any question of the candidates they would like…as long as it originates from the list of prepared questions.
As in any Presidential debate that I can remember, Democrat or Republican, no one asked any of the questions I would like to have asked the Presidential hopefuls. I don’t recall hearing any questioning along the lines of:
1) what would you do about GMOs and GMO labeling?
2) what are your thoughts about geo-engineering, specifically the 15+ year campaign of climate modification that has been ongoing over US skies for many years? Would you bring an end to this operation?
3) do you intend to hold anyone accountable in the Plume-Gate multi-agency cover-up?
4) would you as President insist on the release of suppressed technologies and order the systematic shutting down and decommissioning of our nuclear plants in light of the 1.3 million Americans who are projected to die from Fukushima fallout and in light of the backlog of spent fuel that has no place to go and continues to pile up in spent fuel pools across the nation?
4) would you bring an end to the fluoridation of our drinking water supplies?
5) in light of the fact that the CIA was behind the creation, financing, and training of Al-Qaeda, do you think ISIS is just another ‘terrorist’ organization under control of the CIA? And if so what will you do about unlawful foreign wars and illegal CIA assassinations and financing of extremist groups abroad?
6) do you intend to hold anyone accountable in the case of the 5,200 Pentagon/DOD child porn transmitters including the 76 that held Top Secret clearances? If not please explain why.
7) do you intend to repeal the TPPA?
8) what are your thoughts on the use of depleted uranium on the battlefield and the mutations/birth defects it causes in indigenous populations?
9) do you believe that the Iraq war was a lawful war and that 9/11 was an act of war perpetrated by the Iraqi government and NOT a criminal act by extremists?
10) are you for or against an audit of the Federal Reserve or of nationalizing the Federal Reserve or of any other optional method of coining US currency?
11) how would you hold the Pentagon accountable for the missing 8.5 trillion dollars they cannot seem to locate?
12) are you for or against mandatory vaccinations?
13) what would you do to help homeless vets find suitable housing?
I would also like to point out that not only were the questions pre-formulated by establishment propagandists, but at one point in the ‘debate’ the moderator directed the candidates to a question from a FaceBook user: what appeared to be a teenage youth reading from a queue-card or teleprompter (you could watch his eyes scan across the screen) and asking what candidates intended to do about the threat of ISIS.
This appeared to be a sloppy attempt to convince the public that teenagers, in this case a black youth, are concerned with the ever impending threat of ISIS. It wasn’t convincing to me or anyone else I talked to last night. It is my opinion that teenagers are more concerned with scoring some beer and getting laid, not ISIS.
It seemed to me that the only thing real about the Republican ‘debate’ last night was the hatred for Donald Trump, from both the other candidates and the moderators. This is in no way an endorsement for Mr. Trump, many of you know how I feel about America’s fetish for voting for multi-millionaires who don’t know or care about what the poor folks go though everyday.
But I did notice an attitude towards Mr. Trump, who seemed to be the only one to speak his mind and appear comfortable doing so. Again, this is in no way an endorsement for another mainstream, multi-millionaire candidate. Just an observation.
At the end of the day it seems obvious to me that the election system in this country is broken. Candidates we are to choose from are pre-selected and only the Democrat and Republican contenders are placed in front of the lights and camera. To be sure there are third party candidates, but you generally don’t get to see their names until you step into the booth to vote or receive your absentee ballot. Then you look down and say to yourself ‘who are these people and why have I never heard of them?’
So don’t expect an arena where the public is free to ask any question they want. And don’t expect anything other than the two-party duopoly we’ve been saddled with for as long as I can remember.
Thank you for your attention in this matter-HP
Important Related Links
Please enjoy my latest work from the recording studio by clicking the link below:
Voting Insanity: Why I am Unable to Take the 2016 Presidential Election Seriously
By Hatrick ‘Hattie’ Penry
July 22nd, 2015
The problem is the American public is operating from a position of extreme ignorance. Even if you could elect an honest President who knew ALL of our problems and was prepared to address those problems, he or she would be assassinated before the establishment relinquished any substantial amount of money or power. It is patently absurd to think that at this stage of the problem a President can be elected who will not only hold accountable the criminals who led our country into this abysmal situation but who will be able to make the sweeping changes needed to our government without his or her plane falling out of the sky for no logical reason.
The problem is systematic. The system must be changed. To change the system you must first remove those who have subverted it. This would take place in the form of a ‘police action’ where ‘arrests en masse’ would be conducted and many thousands in government, media and the corporate sector taken into custody. You cannot try Caesar in his own court: a new ‘Nuremberg’ type court would be created and run by trustworthy Americans drawn from the ranks of the working poor. These patriotic Americans could also be used to stock an interim, alternative government until such time as we can understand how our Constitution was subverted to such a degree and put in place countermeasures to prevent future subversion.
At this point in the game, the fact that so many Americans are voting as if the system could still bring about real change is not only very disturbing but it is an indicator of how the social engineers of the establishment have been able to facilitate a ‘dumbed-down’ population over the years. A population that won’t think twice about voting on an electronic voting machine that can be hacked for $30 of parts. Again, the American public is operating from a position of extreme ignorance. Why? They have simply been denied the facts.
“You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on.”-George W. Bush
Let’s talk about the information monopoly that controls our perception of reality.
It is robust. It is wide-spread. It is organized and orchestrated. Many thousands are knowingly participating in keeping from the public facts and information the public needs to know in order to protect themselves and their families from harm. The Plume-Gate cover-up is an excellent example of how powerful the information monopoly is. Millions of Americans will die from Fukushima fallout…most will never know what hit them. Hiding a crime of this magnitude from the public at large, requires control of the mainstream media, the alternative media, FaceBook, YouTube, acedemia, and much, much more.
Yes, it is full-spectrum information dominance. No, the American public does not have free speech, only the appearance of free speech. The fact is your tax money is being taken from you and used to finance the very information monopoly that keeps you ignorant and powerless (plus they have nearly unlimited funds of their own at their disposal). How can the handful of us who know the truth shout over the myriad perception management specialists and controlled opposition agents operating for the establishment? Our adversaries are the ultra rich. They tax us and use our money against us. They can print their own money. In financial terms, how do the handful of truth tellers left compete against that kind of advantage?
“Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.” -from the ‘Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion’
At the end of the day you can’t vote your way out of the crisis we now find ourselves in. Throwing money at the problem doesn’t seem to help either. And if the phrase ‘arrests en masse’ doesn’t mean anything to you or if it sounds outrageous…it’s just further proof that you are operating from a position of extreme ignorance: a result of the establishment’s lockdown on information.
The matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth. If you want to see that truth you may have try something completely different…anything else would be insanity.
The Great White Hype: Why Rand Paul And Bernie Sanders Are Not The Solution
by Hatrick ‘Hattie’ Penry
July 5th, 2015
To be quite honest I no longer care what politicians say or promise. They are all liars and they all sell out the moment elected, if they haven’t already. They won’t discuss the issues I find important. So I’m through voting unless it’s for one last vote to determine when arrests en masse will be conducted and when we will institute a new court and hold Nuremberg type trials (positions in this new court to be filled by drawing from the ranks of the working poor).
Tell me what politicians are talking about:
(below: cancer resulting from radioactive fallout takes years to reach peak effect.)
2) Addressing the nuclear crisis by
a: Systematically shutting down and decommissioning all nuclear reactors in the US. (technology that will produce the needed replacement power found by addressing number 6 below)
b: finding a solution/resolution to the problem of long term storage of the incredible amount of backlogged spent nuclear fuel and addressing the problem of non-seismically qualified spent fuel pools.
(below- from Project: Operation Flicker)
4) Finding justice/compensation for the 7,800 of our soldiers experimented on by ‘Operation: Paperclip’ Nazis imported by the US government post WW2. Some of these horrific experiments included septal implants to control human will and behavior.
5) Outlawing any further aerosol engineering over US air space (bring back H.R.2977 in its original form)
(below: from “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” published in 1996 by USAF Air University, Air Command and Staff College)
6) Patent suppression:
According to the Institute for New Energy, as of 1997, “the U.S. Patent Office has classified over 3,000 patent devices or applications under the secrecy order, Title 35, U.S. Code (1952) Sections 181-188.” The Federation of Americans Scientists revealed that by the end of Fiscal Year 2010, this number had ballooned to 5,135 inventions and included “review and possible restriction” on any solar cell with greater than twenty percent efficiency, or any power system that is more than seventy to eighty percent efficient at converting energy. How can we as a nation have a rational discussion on energy policy (or economics) considering technology is being suppressed at this level?
8) Prosecuting war criminals for the illegal invasion of Iraq.
9) Launching an investigation into the CIA’s involvement in the creation/funding/training/outfitting of Al Qaeda and ISIS.
10) Arresting/jailing bankers involved with the recent financial meltdowns.
11) Reducing military expenditures/size of government by 50%.
12) Bringing an end to the ‘war on drugs’.
Remember that where there is no accountability there is no law.
Please inform me when Rand Paul or Bernie Sanders talks about any (or preferably ALL) of the items listed above.
Alex Jone Avoids NRC FOIA Documents For 4 Years. Why?
by Hatrick Penry
“I do agree that there has been a deafening silence in the alternative media over this massive government orchestrated cover-up. It’s not about the alternative media not covering the disaster. It is about the alternative [media] not covering the recently released documents that prove there was a concerted government cover-up.” -Author/Blogger Alexander Higgins in 2012
(Below: from the NRC FOIA documents pertaining to Fukushima-an example of how important these transcripts are…proof positive that NRC officials sacrificed the lives of our sailors to avoid the ‘angst’ of moving Navy ships and revealing to the American public the danger of a ‘repeated plume event’ headed their way.)
For 4 long years Alex Jones and his guests have avoided reading from the NRC FOIA documents pertaining to Fukushima. Mr. Jones has covered almost every aspect of the Fukushima disaster, but one common thread remains among Mr. Jones, his crew and his myriad guests: none have ever read from the NRC FOIA documents. Mr. Jones has had some big names from the so-called anti-nuclear movement on his show in the past: Arnie Gundersen, Greg Palast, Chris Busby and Helen Caldicott, among others…but not a single one has read from the NRC FOIA documents pertaining to Fukushima. Is this a coincidence?
Back in 2012 I sent all the information I had in regards to the Plume-Gate cover-up and the NRC FOIA documents to InfoWars and was roundly ignored. Why? Do they consider the NRC FOIA documents pertaining to Fukushima to be irrelevant?
“Don’t kid yourself for a second that it’s insignificant that Arnie [Gundersen] would go on Alex Jones’ show and refuse to come on mine.” -Author/Broadcaster Michael C. Ruppert in 2014
(Below: from the NRC FOIA documents pertaining to Fukushima-I amassed over 100 pages of hard evidence that the Unit 4 spent fuel pool caught fire and was a ‘melt on the floor’…even the IAEA admits it burned and released radiation for at least 9 hours. Please note an orchestrated hoax meant to convince the world that the Unit 4 spent fuel has been offloaded is circulating amongst mainstream and alternative media alike. Interestingly enough, the same entities perpetuating this falsehood are also the ones refusing to read from the NRC FOIA documents.)
At the end of the day I can only tell you that the blame cannot fall on the shoulders of InfoWars alone: the ‘alternative media’ in general has failed miserably when it comes to informing the public about the Plume-Gate cover-up and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Freedom Of Information Act documents pertaining to Fukushima.
It’s been 4 long years. What are they waiting for?
(Authors note: I am available anytime to read from the NRC FOIA documents for Mr. Jones or to provide for him specific screen captures he may read himself if he prefers.)
Operation Mockingbird Style Alternative Media Infiltration Exposed!!! (all about the infiltration and subversion of the Alternative Media)
by Hatrick Penry
Here are the Plume-Gate basics, condensed into a short, easy to read abstract.
(below) From my book “Something Wicked This Way Comes: the Story of Plume-Gate the World’s Largest, Provable Cover-Up“: my assessment of initial conditions at the Fukushima Daiichi facility as found in the NRC FOIA documents.
(below) Also from my book: fundamentals of the cover-up I call Plume-Gate.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: March 13th, 2011 NRC’s head of OPA, Eliot Brenner admits “While we know more than what these [press release, blog posts] say, we’re sticking to this story for now.”
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: evidence of subversion of the Freedom of Information Act. (Persons that know they are being recorded either censor themselves in real time or take the conversation offline altogether as seen in this transcript.)
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: flawed modeling was based on 96 hours of emissions. Evidence in the NRC FOIAs reveal that plumes were still being measured (not modeled) at the end of the Month of March, 2011.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: the President’s case, a worst-case-scenario, included the three reactors and all four spent fuel pools but was also based on a short duration of 4-5 days of emissions. Also, it is important to note that I have found no evidence in the FOIAs of Plutonium being modeled, only Iodine-131 and Cesium-137.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: March 16th, 2011 evidence that NRC officials were aware that conditions at the stricken Fukushima facility were much worse than they were willing to admit to the general public.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: a March 15th email confirms the worst has already happened “U2 ex-vessel, U4 zirc fire SFP, catastrophe”
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: March 15th, 2011 Japanese authorities admit the Unit 4 spent fuel pool is on fire and “…radioactivity is being released directly into the atmosphere.”
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: NRC official Jennifer Uhle perpetuates the cover-up at a September, 2013 public meeting “…the Fukushima events did not result in any loss of inventory or caused any kind of heat-up in any of the spent fuel pools affected.”
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: 1) evidence (in her own words) contradicting NRC official Jennifer Uhle’s statement at a September, 2013 public meeting that the spent fuel pools at Fukushima did not suffer any ‘heat-up’ and 2) evidence that shows NRC officials and Naval reactors were still discussing ‘concrete ablation temperatures’ as late as March 21st, 2011…this is important because NRC officials recanted their initial position on conditions at Fukushima, especially in regards to the spent fuel pools, and offered the ‘fog-of-war’ excuse in that information was sketchy for the first 72 hours and that an honest mistake had been made in their assumptions. This is proof that far beyond that 72 hour time frame officials were still concerned with the ‘melt on the floor’ of the spent fuel at Unit 4.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: Navy ships were not moved en masse to protect them from fallout, even though Navy and NRC officials were aware that plumes were a ‘repeated event’. Evidence in the NRC FOIAs reveal that a worst-case-scenario was considered, but never acted upon.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: evidence of ‘overconservatism’ in the transpacific modeling of doses to children (remember that modeling was based on short duration emissions of 4-5 days).
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: evidence of ‘cherry-picking’ of source terms (sources of radioactive emissions) and plume/dose models.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: March 20th, 2011 NRC official Jim Wiggins discusses a White House request to run a model that will make President Obama’s Rose Garden speech true…3 days AFTER the speech has already been given. Remember that President Obama left for South America with family not long after his Rose Garden advisory…
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: Mark Schaffer (at IAEA) has requested permission to share the NRC SitRep (situation report) with the Chinese government…OIP was advised this document should not be shared…concerns with any plans to share the SitRep with the Chinese government are: 1) U.S. States have been denied access to this document, and 2) If we share the document with the Chinese government, this precedent could obligate us to honor requests from other international stakeholders as well…
(below) a map of NPPs in the US that sampled fallout from Fukushima. As far away as Lithuania detected aerosolized plutonium emissions from the disaster.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: data collected at US NPPs is secreted into a password protected database and is unavailable to the public at large.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: one of two emails from NRC official Gary Holahan pointing out that there are many non-seismically qualified spent fuel pools right here in the US.
(below) NOT FROM THE FOIA DOCUMENTS: The Mangano/Sherman fatality index study reveals an increase in the death rate in the United States post Fukushima (note that these figures were conservative and later updated to reflect a higher number of fatalities). Similar findings occurred in 1986 following the Chernobyl meltdown.
(below) NOT FROM THE NRC FOIA DOCUMENTS: From the bobby1 fatality index study…1.3 million Americans will die from Fukushima fallout by the year 2030. These figures are conservative estimates.
Approach, Infiltrate, Influence, Sabotage: Patterns of Deception in the ‘Alternative’ Media and ‘Anti’ Nuclear Movement
Approach, Infiltrate, Influence, Sabotage:
Patterns of Deception in the ‘Alternative’ Media and ‘Anti’ Nuclear Movement
By Hatrick Penry
Back in February of 2012 online broadcaster Bob Tuskin approached my wife Debbie at her Father’s Laundromat and, after saying some nice things about my writing on FaceBook, asked if I might be interested in writing for The IntelHub (now The IntelliHub). When I heard the news I was very excited. I had never been published before. In fact, no one had really paid any attention to anything I had ever written except for my wife, my mother or my teachers from school. So I began to write for The IntelHub as a freelance writer who was upfront and vocal about NOT being in it for the money. I never accepted payment, even when Mr. Tuskin offered me ‘Federal notes’.
Until I wrote about Plume-Gate and the NRC FOIA documents I was happy as a writer for The IntelHub. When I began to write about the world’s largest, provable cover-up and the fact that the ‘alternative’ media was remaining silent on this incredible story, I noticed that someone began to subtly modify my Plume-Gate articles (and only my Plume-Gate articles). Words were added or deleted from my titles. Sentences were shortened. I was being censored. (It was during this time I created the pen-name Hatrick Penry and wrote Operation Mockingbird Alternative Media Infiltration Exposed! I credit Alexander Higgins as the only one with the courage enough to publish what still to this day is the only legitimate critique of Alex Jones and his InfoWars operation.)
When I asked The IntelHub co-founder Alex Thomas why my Plume-Gate articles had been modified, he was evasive and avoided answering my questions. When I pointed this out, the fact that he would not explain why my articles had been modified and the fact I had asked the same questions more than once without receiving a proper answer, I was blocked on FaceBook (where we had been communicating), my 40+ articles were promptly deleted from The IntelHub website and any trace of my name was removed.
“The petty man is eager to make boasts, yet desires that others should believe in him. He enthusiastically engages in deception, yet wants others to have affection for him. He conducts himself like an animal, yet wants others to think well of him.” ~Xun Zi
After my experience with The IntelHub I began to focus on FaceBook and my WordPress blog. My strategy was two-fold: report on the NRC FOIA documents and report on those who would not report on the NRC FOIA documents. During this time I became ‘friends’ with a person on FaceBook calling herself Julia Mitchell: she was very complimentary of my writing and told me everything I wanted to hear. She knew all about the infiltration of ‘alternative’ media and agreed with me on every point. I asked her to join my FaceBook group ‘COINTROLLPRO’ where I would be investigating the trolls and shills of the ‘alternative’ media. She accepted. At some point one of Julia Mitchell’s friends posted an article on FaceBook that stated Fukushima fallout would NOT reach the United States and that we had nothing to fear. In response, I posted 5-6 of my Plume-Gate articles in his thread.
My punishment for so doing was swift and severe. I was immediately ‘un-friended’ and blocked by both of these characters. Julia Mitchell went on to write an article in the ‘Examiner’ stating that I was an undercover COINTELPRO agent (COINTELPRO stands for Counter Intelligence Program). I can’t say I was shocked or that this was something new: Ed Chiarini (aka: dallasgoldbug) had already attacked and slandered me by saying I was an Illuminati actor who played Mark Dice, Danger Ehram (from the movie Jackass), Sheppard Ambellas and several other characters after I wrote to him to ask about The IntelHub and Alex Jones.
“People always overdo the matter when they attempt deception.” ~Charles Dudley Warner
In November of 2012 I began to receive messages in my BlogTalkRadio message box from a man named Pete Santilli. Mr. Santilli, also a broadcaster, praised my radio show and my writing and claimed he was on a crusade to expose Alex Jones as a fraud. Mr. Santilli pointed to a video on YouTube claiming that InfoWars hired former STRATFOR employee Molly Maroney and went on to claim that he had inside information that STARTFOR was a CIA front. It wasn’t long before Mr. Santilli asked if I would be a regular on his Friday broadcast and I accepted his invitation.
Everything was fine and I had a great time until Mr. Santilli began his weekday broadcasts with an interview of two characters (Stewart Rhodes and Sheriff Richard Mack) who had just been interviewed by Alex Jones at InfoWars (one within just 24 hours). In an article titled ‘Why I quit the Pete Santilli Show’ I asked hard questions:
“Who has the connections to land these two characters? Why would Mr. Santilli draw from the same shill circuit as Alex Jones? Why would they do this knowing how I (and many others) feel about the trolls that work for Jones? Why would Mr. Santilli invite me on his show and then pull a stunt like this? Isn’t that called ‘hanging someone out to dry’? Did they not think someone would make the connection? Isn’t it hypocritical to harp on Alex Jones over the acquisition of Molly Maroney and then interview two long-time guests (and good friends) of Alex Jones?”
I never got answers from Mr. Santilli but I did get slandered by him: he broadcast that he ‘fired’ me, accused me of being a COINTELPRO agent and then proceeded to attack me in a bizarre tabloid style article.
(below) Pete Santilli’s YouTube Channel’s ‘Related Videos’…notice the link to Alex Jones. At this point, I have to conclude Mr. Santilli works for Alex Jones and was tasked with leading a bogus movement against him.
“The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him” ~Proverbs 18:17
In 2013 (not sure of exact date) I receive in my YouTube inbox a message from Jann Brooks, aka: MrsMilkytheclown (MMTC). She praises my work in her message and during a subsequent phone call (the only one we would ever have) claimed she knew of another NRC FOIA researcher and suggested she have him call me. I agreed.
This is when I first came to know Shane Russell (aka: Shazzam or Shazzamm1971 on YouTube). Again, he told me everything I wanted to hear. My broadcasts were awesome, my videos were amazing, my articles fabulous. Mr. Russell suggested we work together and, as he seemed knowledgeable in not only NRC FOIA documents (providing an Adam link and link to a FOIA primer I had never seen and had no clue about) but in nuclear power and nuclear power plants in general, I accepted.
For several months I never suspected Mr. Russell of being anything other than what he claimed he was: another NRC FOIA researcher interested in shutting down nuclear power forever and bringing the participants in the cover-up I called Plume-Gate to justice. I spoke openly and freely with Mr. Russell on the phone as I always have with anyone, phone call or not. We exchanged information and theories and Mr. Russell would often send me screencaptures from the NRC FOIA documents or send links to whole files (it wasn’t until December of 2013 that another NRC FOIA researcher, Maureen Burke, informed me that most of Mr. Russell’s FOIA screencaptures originated from her and that he was taking the credit for her work).
It wasn’t until the day of my interview on Michael C. Ruppert’s ‘The Lifeboat Hour’ that Mr. Russell began to show his hand. When I logged onto FaceBook that day I was shocked to find that he had gone on Mr. Ruppert’s FaceBook page and began an argument with Mr. Ruppert himself…an argument that climaxed in Mr. Russell being blocked by Mr. Ruppert.
Mind you on the day of the biggest interview of my life, an interview that undoubtedly would raise Plume-Gate awareness to a whole new level, my ‘partner’ appeared as if he was doing his best to get me booted off the show. Why would he risk the chance to broadcast Plume-Gate to the world over an argument with Michael Ruppert? Why risk angering the man who was about to interview me that evening? In a message to Mr. Russell that same day I asked if he was trying to get me booted off the show and couldn’t he argue over coal and oil and alternative energy with Mr. Ruppert TOMORROW when the interview was over?
Around the time of my interview on The Lifeboat Hour (not sure exactly when but right around that time frame) I received a phone call from Mr. Russell wherein I was told a fantastic tale about a meeting between Arnie Gundersen (of Fairewinds Associates) and Jann Brooks (MrsMilkeytheclown from YouTube). I will repeat the story from memory as Mr. Russell was careful to only tell it to myself and Maureen Burke (a fellow NRC FOIA researcher) over the phone (also in phone conversations with two other individuals who confirm they were told the same story):
According to Mr. Shane Russell:
Because MMTC hosts Arnie Gundersen’s Fairewinds videos on a regular basis she eventually makes contact with Maggie Gundersen who arranges a meeting between Jann Brooks (MMTC) and Mr. Gundersen. Mr. Gundersen is in Michigan (where Jann Brooks lives) for the Ferme NPP court case, so the meeting is a convenient one. Before the meeting, Mr. Gundersen calls to make final arrangements with MMTC who seems to think that Mr. Gundersen sounded intoxicated on alcohol over the phone.
For the lunch date with Mr. Gundersen, MMTC will be joined by Christina Consolo (aka: Radchick) a former radio broadcaster and self-proclaimed anti-nuclear activist who also lives in Michigan. Before the luncheon, the three meet and, as the story goes, Mr. Gundersen is acting like a ‘giddy schoolgirl’ and MMTC thinks he has been drinking alcohol.
During the lunch meet Mr. Gundersen leaves twice to call his wife and is acting very strangely. Christina Consolo (Radchick) attempts to land a job with Fairewinds Associates. After the meeting, the three go their own way. MMTC ends up in an old bookstore and while searching through the section pertaining to nuclear power she stumbles upon an old letter from the company that owns Ferme. The letter, an original not a copy, contains incriminating information that proves Ferme is cutting costs in the safety department: this is exactly what the court case Mr. Gundersen is involved in is about-Ferme cutting the safety budget and the effects of doing so. Realizing this is an incredible stroke of luck, Jann Brooks (MMTC) calls Mr. Gundersen to inform him of her find. A second meeting is arranged between Jann Brooks and Mr. Gundersen.
At the second meeting Mr. Gundersen refuses a copy of the incriminating letter and insists on having the original. When MMTC refuses to turn over the original, Mr. Gundersen attempts to snatch the letter from her hand. Unsuccessful in his brazen attempt to take the original letter by force, Mr. Gundersen says he does not want a copy and is no longer interested in the information. The meeting ends.
This all caused me quite a bit of angst: I could say nothing as it is all hearsay to me but I kept asking myself: why would Mr. Russell and Jann Brooks remain quiet on such blockbuster information so critical to the anti-nuclear movement? The story would likely have ended here if it were not for my wife who, after hearing me grumble and complain for 2-3 weeks about the whole situation wrote Jann Brooks (MMTC) in an attempt to find out what the truth was.
In her response Jann Brooks tells a completely different story: she did meet with Arnie Gundersen, the meeting was amicable, and AG parts with the documentation without incident.
Note that in my wife’s letter she does not name the name of the source of the story, but a) MMTC must know it is Mr. Russell who she knows I have semi-regular phone conversations with and who she does as well and b) MMTC immediately forwards my wife’s letter to Mr. Russell (who forwards it to me and to Kevin Blanch) so that he is aware of the situation. To be sure, MMTC was quick to let the cat out of the bag and seemed not to be worried at all that someone was spreading such outrageous rumors about her and Mr. Gundersen (in fact this last week Jann Brooks friended Mr. Russell on Facebook). Interestingly enough, any chance to observe Mr. Russell’s future actions without him knowing about what I had found out was ruined when MMTC made him immediately aware. Also, there was mention of a late night phone call with MMTC the night she forwarded my wife’s letter to Mr. Russell but I never could get Mr. Russell to tell me what the phone call was about.
Realizing that the ‘cat was out of the bag’ I confronted Mr. Russell with this information and began asking questions.
As of yet, I have NOT received a proper answer from any of the persons involved in this case. Instead, a campaign of baseless attacks and slander has been mounted against me by everyone involved.
Update: in a video that has since been removed from YouTube (although I have a copy on my portable drive) Jann Brooks claims she did not make up the fantastic Arnie Gundersen story but REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HEARD THE STORY FROM MR. SHANE RUSSELL (WHO SHE HOOKED ME UP WITH) AND INSTEAD OF BEING ANGRY AT MR. RUSSEL FOR TELLING A LIE ABOUT JANN BROOKS TO MULTIPLE PEOPLE, SHE IS ANGRY WITH ME. AGAIN, SOMETHING IS TERRIBLY WRONG WITH THIS CREW AND I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND THIS. ALL I DID WAS ASK QUESTIONS WHEN I KNEW SOMEONE HAD LIED TO ME. IF MR. SHANE RUSSELL IS THE LIAR, WHY IS JANN BROOKS NOT DIRECTING HER ANGER AND VITRIOL TOWARDS HIM? WHY AM I BEING ATTACKED???
(below) Certain person=Christina Consolo aka: RadChick
Update: (2/21/14) In a message to my wife on FaceBook Kevin Blanch now admits the fantastic tale of Arnie Gundersen DID COME FROM JANN BROOKS. Interestingly enough, Mr. Blanch has sat on this fact for weeks while Jann Brooks, Shane Russell and others attacked and slandered me in what appears to be an orchestrated effort (including Mr.Blanch’s video cursing at me and calling me a shill). Why did Mr. Blanch keep quiet when he knew the whole time that Jann Brooks was the origin of the fabricated story? What kind of person(s) act in such a deceptive manner? Was the fantastic tale of Arnie Gundersen an attempt to bait me into reporting on something I had no proof of? Imagine if I had been stupid enough to write an article or post a video telling the Jann Brooks story of drunken Arnie trying to snatch the documents from her hand…could Mr. Gundersen then have sued me for slander or defamation of character?
Again, Jann Brooks is angry with me for ‘attacking’ her, but all I did was ask about the fantastic tale of Arnie Gundersen and it was never an attack, I never used vulgarity or harsh tones…only asked questions TO WHICH THEY ALL KNEW THE ANSWSER BUT DID THEIR BEST TO OBFUSCATE MY INVESTIGATION.
“…I repeated the story Jann told me to Shane in a very innocent way…” ~Kevin Blanch 2/21/14
It is important to note that 1) Jann Brooks finances Mr. Blanch and 2) although Mr. Blanch says that “Gundersen is worthless” his ‘Post Ignorance’ website links to an article that quotes and promotes Arnie Gundersen AND the Unit 4 offload hoax. This fact was brought to Mr. Blanches attention over a month ago.
Again, I hope you understand that the fantastic tale of Arnie Gundersen is not some ‘innocent’ story being told for fun and games. I have been very effective at debunking Arnie Gundersen and it is widely known that as a result I (and my wife for that matter) have been blacklisted from groups like the Coalition Against Nuclear and InfoWars…places that Arnie is welcome but because I have pointed out the fact he downplays and dismisses the NRC FOIAs I am banned for life. I’ve no doubt that Mr. Gundersen would like to see me silenced. Remember that with the help of Michael C. Ruppert, I forced Mr. Gundersen to address the contents of the NRC FOIAs…this is how I debunked him. Could it be possible that Jann Brooks works for Mr. Gundersen? We know she meets with Mr. Gundersen personally and she continues to host his videos even after I have thoroughly debunked Mr. Gundersen and explained how controlled opposition works. If Mr. Blanch is financed by Jann Brooks and Jann Brooks takes her orders from Mr. Gundersen it all begins to make sense. This would explain why Mr. Blanch knew the whole time that Jann Brooks was the originator of the story but chose to not only remain silent, but to attack and slander me in a video and call me a shill.
(below) After months of agreeing with me on every aspect why Arnie and Maggie Gundersen could only be controlled opposition agents, I find that Shane Russell has Maggie Gundesen on his Twitter feed and he’s ‘liking’ Arnie’s videos on YouTube. How’s that for deception?
“The new freedom of expression brought by the Internet goes far beyond politics. People relate to each other in new ways, posing questions about how we should respond to people when all that we know about them is what we have learned through a medium that permits all kinds of anonymity and deception.” ~Peter Singer
I hope all of you will understand that this is the FOURTH time that this has happened to me, that is to say, I feel my confidence was gained by someone in an effort to later sabotage my credibility or control some aspect of my work. In each instance I have been careful to document everything that happened. I have written multiple articles in an effort to keep the public aware. I hope you understand that once again, a pattern I recognize has unfolded before my eyes and I must be cautious and protect myself and my work. I have no choice but to disassociate myself from these characters.
Finally, I am not going to stop extending trust to people. If consequently you trick, deceive or lie to me, I see the fault as being yours, not mine. Normal humans love and trust one another. I want to remain a normal human. ~HP
Related article by Glenn Greenwald: How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations